How an Estate Planning Nightmare Cost This Family $500,000!Charlie and Evie Vigne created a trust in 1996 to take care of how their four children would receive their inheritance. The original trust stated Georgia and Shirley were to receive a 50% share in the family home in Graton and their two sisters (Patty and Jane) would each get $200,000 from the bank CDs.

Charlie died in 2016. In 2017, Shirley had her mother, who was suffering from dementia, sign an amendment to the trust. Shirley didn’t tell any of her sisters about this amendment. When Evie died in 2020, Shirley surprised her three sisters with the 2017 amendment. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the reason Shirley kept this document a secret was it stated she was to receive everything and her sisters nothing! In fact, that amendment had already given Shirley full title to the home before Evie died.

Evie and Charlie were clear about how they wanted their daughters to share their inheritance. Suddenly, while suffering from dementia, Evie decided to cut out three of her four kids? But she was now gone. Shirley said her mother “liked her best” for taking care of mom at the end and she even claimed that she urged mom not to keep it a secret. While she “felt for her sisters,” she claimed, she couldn’t go against her mom’s wishes of keeping this a secret until Evie.

The three sisters hired an attorney to sue Shirley and challenge the dubious amendment. This case created a terrible fiscal and family loss. When the case was eventually settled, the sisters were forced to sell the house as legal fees had eaten up all the cash in the CDs. Shirley’s three sisters were so angry with her, they vowed they’d never speak to her ever again.

Family home? Sold to pay off the settlement. Life savings of $500,000? Gone in legal fees. Original plan for the hard-earned savings and family home? Up in smoke. In the end, two law firms became Charlie and Evie’s largest beneficiaries for all their life’s hard work. The sisters? None of them speak to Shirley to this day.

DARCI Score: 4

4 / 6
  1. Was there a scam or tampering that could have been blocked? – YES
  2. Would alerts have brought light and helped stop? – YES
  3. Two-factor authentication? – YES
  4. Would DARCI have saved the $500k in legal fees? – YES
  5. Would secure digital storage have helped avoid? – No, not relevant to this case
  6. Conveniently grant access to relevant parties? – Not in this case

The case above represents an actual case litigated by our company founders, Ann and Adam Eberts. The names of the individuals involved have been changed. There is no need to further shame the bad actors. Illuminote simply wants to show how easy fraud, undue influence, forgeries, and other financial crimes are these days. We also want to show how easy it is to avoid, now that a registry for your important documents is available.